Classical Argument Outline

1. The introduction, which warms up the audience, establishes goodwill and rapport with the readers, and announces the general theme or thesis of the argument.
    
    I will start by writing about the common sense that everyone must have thought of:  what is the exact meaning of human emotion? Then, I will give a example based on the opinion most people give that they are controlling their mental change and emotions. After that I'm going to say that this opinion is a wrong expression for the essence of human emotion and mention the thesis that 'Human is actually not controlling and not able to control their emotions.'    

2. The narration, which summarizes relevant background material, provides any information the audience needs to know about the environment and circumstances that produce the argument, and set up the stakes-what’s at risk in this question. In academic writing, this often takes the form of a literature review.

I will show what I've researched about and explain about distinction between emotion and feelings how the emotion comes or be triggered and the way humans notice and regulate their emotion which can make them misunderstand that they have an ability to control their emotions. I will give a brief introduction of the history of human emotion from our ancestors to current ourselves.    

3. The confirmation,which lays out in a logical order (usually strongest to weakest or most obvious to most subtle) the claims that support the thesis, providing evidence for each claim.

I will start by describing how human depends on several basic inner systems and therapies to feel and response to their emotion. I will emphasize that human emotion progresses and occur unconsciously, not by their own ability by telling about the Basic human emotion. I will descibe the paradox that humans think they can control emotion but they rely on the external therapy because they have difficulty to notice the limit of themselves. I will examine that human can control the response of their emotion, not their emotion which rapidly appears to us.  

4. The refutation and concession, which looks at opposing viewpoints to the writer’s claims, anticipating objections from the audience, and allowing as much of the opposing viewpoints as possible without weakening the thesis.

I will concede that not expressin the response from the actual emotion can be a repressing or even controlling of emotion. I will concede the examples of actor and actress, gagman and gagwoman who have to do their job not cling to their present emotion and feelings.  

5. The summation, which provides a strong conclusion, amplifying the force of the argument,  and showing the readers that this solution is the best at meeting the circumstances.

I will summarize my previous points and then give a emphasis on the unconcsious effect on human being. I will end by mentioning my orginal thesis again.